Internet-Draft BGP extensions for BIER-TE October 2026
Chen, et al. Expires 21 April 2027 [Page]
Workgroup:
BIER
Internet-Draft:
draft-chen-bier-idr-bier-te-bgp-07
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
R. Chen
ZTE Corporation
L. Changwang
New H3C Technologies
B. Xu
ZTE Corporation
Z. Zhang
ZTE Corporation

BGP extensions for BIER-TE

Abstract

"Tree Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication" (BIER-TE) shares architecture and packet formats with BIER. BIER-TE forwards and replicates packets based on a BitString in the packet header, but every BitPosition of the BitString of a BIER-TE packet indicates one or more adjacencies.

This document describes BGP extensions for advertising the BIER-TE specific information.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 April 2027.

▲

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

"Tree Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication" (BIER-TE) shares architecture and packet formats with BIER as described in [RFC8279]. BIER-TE forwards and replicates packets based on a BitString in the packet header, but every BitPosition of the BitString of a BIER-TE packet indicates one or more adjacencies as described in [RFC9262].

This document describes BGP extensions for advertising the BIER-TE specific information. More specifically, in this document, we define a new optional, non-transitive BGP attribute, referred to as the BIER-TE attribute, to convey the BIER-TE specific information.

These extensions are applicable to BGP based network scenarios.

1.1. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2. BIER-TE TLV

[RFC9793] defines BIER Path attribute, and this document reuse the Bier Path attribute. The content of the BIER Path attribute is one or more BIER-TE TLV as shown in Figure 1. This TLV contains BIER-TE information associated with a Prefix.

0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Type (TBD1)          |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| sub-domain-id |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                  sub-TLVs (variable)                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                   Figure 1: BIER-TE TLV

Type:A 2-octet field with value TBD1, see IANA Considerations section.

Length: 2 octets.

Subdomain-id: Unique value identifying the BIER-TE sub-domain, 1 octet.

Sub-TLVs: contains one or more sub-TLV. In this document, it defines three sub-TLV: the BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV , the BIER-TE non-MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV and the Bitposition sub-TLV.

2.1. The BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV

This sub-TLV carries the information for the BIER MPLS encapsulation including the label range for a specific BitString length for a certain < MT,SD >. It is advertised within the BIER-TE TLV. This sub-TLV MAY appear multiple times within a single BIER-TE sub-TLV. If the same BitString length is repeated in multiple sub-TLVs inside the same BIER-TE TLV, the BIER-TE TLV MUST be ignored.

0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    Type       |   Length      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Max SI      |BS Len |                    Label              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
              Figure 2: BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV

Type:A 2-octet field with value TBD2.

Length:4

Max SI: Maximum Set Identifier (Section 1 of [RFC8279]) used in the encapsulation for this BIER subdomain for this BitString length, 1 octet. Each SI maps to a single label in the label range. The first label is for SI=0, the second label is for SI=1, etc. If the label associated with the Maximum Set Identifier exceeds the 20-bit range, the sub-sub-TLV MUST be ignored.

Local BitString Length (BS Len): Encoded BitString length as per [RFC8296]. 4 bits.

Label: First label of the range, 20 bits. The labels are as defined in [RFC8296].

2.2. The BIER-TE non-MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV

The sub-TLV is advertised within the BIER-TE TLV.

0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    Type       |   Length      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Max SI      |BS Len |                  BIFT-id              |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
           Figure 3: BIER-TE non-MPLS Encapsulation sub-TLV

Type:A 2-octet field with value TBD3.

Length:4

Max SI: Maximum Set Identifier (Section 1 of [RFC8279]) used in the encapsulation for this BIER subdomain for this BitString length, 1 octet. The first BIFT-id is for SI=0, the second BIFT-id is for SI=1, etc. If the BIFT-id associated with the Maximum Set Identifier exceeds the 20-bit range, the sub-TLV MUST be ignored.

Local BitString Length (BS Len): Encoded BitString length as per [RFC8296]. 4 bits.

BIFT-id: A 20 bit field encoding the first BIFT-id of the BIFT-id range. BIFT-id as per [I-D.ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions].

2.3. The Bitposition sub-TLV

0                   1                   2                   3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          Type                 |             Length            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|           BitPosition-1       |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Adjacency address-1                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
:                                                               :
:                                                               :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|          BitPosition-n        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                   Adjacency address-n                         |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
           Figure 4:Bitposition sub-TLV

Type:A 2-octet field with value TBD4.

Length:4 if the Nexthop is IPv4 address and 16 if the Nexthop is IPv6 address

<BitPosition,Adjacency address>: A 2-octet field encoding the BitPosition associated with a adjacency address. Each adjacency address is a local or remote neighbor address.

The Bitposition sub-TLV is included in the BIER-TE TLV.

3. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Zhaohui Zhang for his valuable suggestions.

4. IANA Considerations

The document requests new allocations from the IANA registries as follows:

4.1. The new BIER-TE TLVs

This document requests assigning code-points from the "BGP BIER Path Attribute Types" registry for the new BIER-TE TLV.

 Value        Description            Reference
---------  ---------------------   ---------------
 TBD1         BIER-TE               This document

4.2. The new BIER-TE Encapsulation sub-TLVs

This document requests assigning code-points from the "BGP BIER-TE TLV sub-TLV Types" for the new BIER-TE Encapsulation sub-TLVs.

Value           Description                      Reference
---------  --------------------------------   ---------------
 TBD2        BIER-TE MPLS Encapsulation        This document
 TBD3        BIER-TE non-MPLS Encapsulation    This document

4.3. The new Bitposition sub-TLV

This document requests assigning code-points from the "BGP BIER-TE TLV sub-TLV Types" for the new Bitposition sub-TLV.

Value           Description                Reference
---------  ----------------------------  ---------------
 TBD4        Bitposition sub-TLV          This document

5. Security Considerations

This document introduces no new security considerations beyond those already discussed in [RFC4271] and [RFC9262].

6. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions]
Dhanaraj, S., Yan, G., Wijnands, I., Psenak, P., Zhang, Z. J., and J. Xie, "LSR Extensions for BIER non-MPLS Encapsulation", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions-05, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bier-lsr-non-mpls-extensions-05>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC4271]
Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8279]
Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Ed., Dolganow, A., Przygienda, T., and S. Aldrin, "Multicast Using Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)", RFC 8279, DOI 10.17487/RFC8279, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8279>.
[RFC8296]
Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Ed., Dolganow, A., Tantsura, J., Aldrin, S., and I. Meilik, "Encapsulation for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) in MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks", RFC 8296, DOI 10.17487/RFC8296, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8296>.
[RFC9262]
Eckert, T., Ed., Menth, M., and G. Cauchie, "Tree Engineering for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER-TE)", RFC 9262, DOI 10.17487/RFC9262, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9262>.
[RFC9793]
Xu, X., Chen, M., Patel, K., Wijnands, IJ., Przygienda, T., and Z. Zhang, Ed., "BGP Extensions for Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)", RFC 9793, DOI 10.17487/RFC9793, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9793>.

Authors' Addresses

Ran Chen
ZTE Corporation
Nanjing
China
Changwang Lin
New H3C Technologies
Beijing
China
Benchong Xu
ZTE Corporation
Nanjing
China
Zheng Zhang
ZTE Corporation
Nanjing
China